• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Some in here said: "Calm down... they aren't going to ban your guns."

Democrats introduce expanded assault-weapons ban
Published January 24, 2013
FoxNews.com

nigbeyotch_zps53ba1254.jpg


bigbeyotch2_zpsd257cbc7.jpg


Congressional Democrats introduced a new and broader assault-weapons ban Thursday, in a vivid press conference that included a display of various weapons they want to outlaw.

It was a measure that was quickly condemned by the National Rifle Association as an assault on the Constitution, "instead of prosecuting criminals or fixing our broken mental health system."

"The American people know gun bans do not work and we are confident Congress will reject Senator Feinstein's wrong-headed approach," spokeswoman Andrew Arulanandam said.

The measure was written by Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who was behind the original 1994 assault-weapons ban which expired in 2004. It marks the first major legislative step since President Obama, in the wake of the Newtown school shooting, called for new gun control measures including a new and stronger assault-weapons ban.

"Our weak gun laws allow these mass killings to be carried out again, and again, and again in our country," Feinstein said. "Weapons, designed originally for the military to kill large numbers of people in close combat, are replicated for civilian use."

She said the bill she and her colleagues are introducing would bar the "sale, transfer, manufacture and importation" of assault weapons. It would also ban magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.

As part of the press conference, lawmakers displayed an array of weapons, including a Colt AR-15, a semi-automatic assault rifle, and an Intratec TEC-9, a semi-automatic handgun.

The move comes after NBC News host David Gregory faced an investigation for displaying a banned magazine on a Sunday show in the District -- but the Senate sergeant-at-arms office said the weapons were displayed Thursday in "compliance" with all applicable laws.

The office said they are "authentic" and in the custody of the Philadelphia and D.C. police departments, which brought them.

The weapons ban, though, faces long odds even after last month's mass school shooting in the state of Connecticut.

In a statement, Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said the proposal would have done "nothing" to prevent the Newtown tragedy and vowed to fight to defeat the bill.

"Washington politicians shouldn't be taking advantage of recent tragedy to try to push an aggressive gun control agenda. Real assault weapons -- machine guns -- are already functionally illegal, and they have been since 1934," he said.

The last ban expired in 2004 when Congress refused to renew it under pressure from the National Rifle Association, a gun advocacy group. There's continuing disagreement about the effectiveness of the original assault-weapons ban, and measures like beefed-up background checks on gun sales may be more likely to pass.

Definitions of what qualifies as an assault weapon have varied over time and across states.

According to a summary from Feinstein's office, her bill would place bans on 120 "specifically named firearms," as well as certain other semiautomatic guns -- and those with a fixed magazine that can hold more than 10 rounds.

While the 1994 law defined an assault weapon as one that had, in most cases, a detachable magazine and at least two characteristics as set by Congress, the new bill would define an assault weapon as one that meets just one of those characteristics.

Some of those characteristics for rifles in the old law included a pistol grip, a folding stock and a bayonet mount. But the Feinstein bill would strip what her office describes as "easy-to-remove" characteristics like the bayonet mount from that list.

Feinstein's office says the bill would grandfather in weapons legally owned before enactment and exempt more than 900 "specifically named weapons" for hunting or sporting purposes.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/24/democrats-reintroduce-assault-weapons-ban/#ixzz2Iw1HCQkK
 

HappyHapyJoyJoy

If you wish to live wisely, ignore sayings including this one.
Re: Some in here said: "Calm down... they aren't going to ban your guns."

Did you not read it?

Feinstein's office says the bill would grandfather in weapons legally owned before enactment and exempt more than 900 "specifically named weapons" for hunting or sporting purposes.

They aren't even proposing doing anything to your guns.
 

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Clever move. Every one knows that even if it passes, this bill will be amended to reduce the spectrum of the guns that will be concerned. So, extended it a first is a good way to make it harder for the Reps to reduce to the minimum the number of guns that will actually be concerned by the final version of the bill.
 

Kingfisher

Here Zombie, Zombie, Zombie...
One thing that I've learned from living in California all these years. Is that twat-cunt-whore Feinstein DOESN'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT GUNS AND JUST TALKS CRAP OUT OF HER MOUTH IN ORDER TO GET SOMETHING IN PAPER WITH HER FUCKING CUNT NAME ON IT!!!!!!!!! This WHORE BAG thought a "Flash Suppressor" was a silencer.

I HATE THAT WHORE!
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
I have yet to hear one good reason why anyone would ever need to own an assault weapon.

They're fun to shoot. I've got a Remington Nylon 66 .22LR for the same reason. It doesn't have a detachable magazine, and I doubt if it would be classified as an assault rifle, but I can crank off 15 rounds as fast as I can pull the trigger.
 

DP_LOVER

I smell PUSSY!
They're fun to shoot. I've got a Remington Nylon 66 .22LR for the same reason. It doesn't have a detachable magazine, and I doubt if it would be classified as an assault rifle, but I can crank off 15 rounds as fast as I can pull the trigger.

still yet to hear a good reason
 

bahodeme

Closed Account
I have yet to hear one good reason why anyone would ever need to own an assault weapon.
Well, I'll use the AR-15. The upper portion can be removed and replaced with a different caliber. You can use it in its original form and dispatch whatever varmints you would like (coyotes, woodchucks, etc.). The next day you are invited to go hunt deer. Change the upper receiver to 6.5 Grendal and have venison burgers later. If you have a problem with bears change the receiver that can accomodate .50 caliber round. If you have 3 different rifles, you have to adjust for these rifles. Here the the only 1.
Here you can find an example of what I'm referring to.
http://www.alexanderarms.com/

Shhh! This is why I brought a crypt and am currently looking for a casket (Terminator 3 reference).
 

PlumpRump

If FreeOnes was a woman, I'd marry her!
still yet to hear a good reason

Because until the 2nd Amendment is repealed, the citizens of the United States have a legal and Constitutionally protected right to them. That seems like good enough reason to me.

I still have yet to hear one good reason to call a woman a cunt, or a gay person a fag. Why don't we go ahead and ban those words, on the basis that they have potential to do harm, despite the Constitution?
 

DP_LOVER

I smell PUSSY!
Because until the 2nd Amendment is repealed, the citizens of the United States have a legal and Constitutionally protected right to them. That seems like good enough reason to me.

I still have yet to hear one good reason to call a woman a cunt, or a gay person a fag. Why don't we go ahead and ban those words, on the basis that they have potential to do harm, despite the Constitution?

The second amendment which was written over 200 years ago and hasnt been 'amended' since?

Yeah thats a great reason to carry weapons that serve no other purpose but to kill people.

and as for the second part of your 'argument'.... i dont know what the fuck you are trying to prove
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
A Hellfire trigger system can turn your semi-automatic AR-15 into a virtual M-16 with this remarkable device:



Ain't nobody gonna take anyone's guns away. There are millions of them already out there so what is anyone going to do about that? Additionally, it is unconstitutional to even try to legislate gun-control measures. Guns are as much a part of American culture as baseball, hotdogs, apple pie and Chevrolet so those who object just need to deal with it. If you actually take the time to read the second amendment and you'll readily see that I am correct.

Because until the 2nd Amendment is repealed, the citizens of the United States have a legal and Constitutionally protected right to them. That seems like good enough reason to me.

:thumbsup: You can't just arbitrarily ignore the parts of the constitution that you don't like. If anyone wants to change the second amendment, a new constitutional amendment needs to be adopted to accomplish it. You can't enact legislation that is unconstitutional....period.
 

Mayhem

Banned
I have yet to hear one good reason why anyone would ever need to own an assault weapon.

I have yet to hear one good reason why anyone would ever need to own a car, truck or motorcycle that can go more than 80mph, let alone 150. More people die in vehicle accidents, the engines that allow these speeds cause exponentially more pollution than engines with a top speed of 80mph would, and use more fuel which makes petroleum a sellers market, which leads to wars.

I have yet to hear one good reason why anyone would ever need to own or consume alcohol. Bourbon, Scotch, Vodka, Tequila, etc. Again, drunk driving deaths and injuries make gun deaths and injuries pale in comparison. Not to mention all the alcohol related incidents that occur without the benefit of a vehicle.

I have yet to hear one good reason why anyone would ever need tobacco products. Talk about something that's only purpose is to kill. Cigarettes, cigars, dip, chew, snuff. Completely unnecessary and go ahead and look up that death toll. And the medical costs leading up to one's demise.

I have yet to hear many good reasons to own a semi-automatic weapon (as opposed to an "assault" weapon). My good friends, the Founding Fathers provided them.
 

Bloodshot Scott

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
They're fun to shoot. I've got a Remington Nylon 66 .22LR for the same reason. It doesn't have a detachable magazine, and I doubt if it would be classified as an assault rifle, but I can crank off 15 rounds as fast as I can pull the trigger.

I've got my Glenfield Marlin which can get off 18 .22LR in a pretty damn quick fashion. Nice little rifle. It's also nice you can get a thousand rounds for about $40.00 too. :)

I'll keep that for my family's land and for when the SHTF and we need to put some meat on the table; keep the Ruger SR22 from my dad for when the S really HTF.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
I've got my Glenfield Marlin which can get off 18 .22LR in a pretty damn quick fashion. Nice little rifle. It's also nice you can get a thousand rounds for about $40.00 too. :)

I'll keep that for my family's land and for when the SHTF and we need to put some meat on the table; keep the Ruger SR22 from my dad for when the S really HTF.

I take my Remington along every time I go fishing. Water Moccasins are real problem where I live.
 
I've got my Glenfield Marlin which can get off 18 .22LR in a pretty damn quick fashion. Nice little rifle. It's also nice you can get a thousand rounds for about $40.00 too. :)

I'll keep that for my family's land and for when the SHTF and we need to put some meat on the table; keep the Ruger SR22 from my dad for when the S really HTF.

I take my Remington along every time I go fishing. Water Moccasins are real problem where I live.

Indeed. Anyone who is serious about survival, small game, etc., definitely needs a .22 rifle. Plus, the ammo is cheap and they are fun as hell to shoot.

Myself, I have a Remington 550-1 semi-auto rifle. It shoots Shorts, Long, and Long Rifle.

rem17.jpg


rem11.jpg


rem23.jpg


rem13.jpg


rem11.jpg


rem22.jpg
 

Bloodshot Scott

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
I take my Remington along every time I go fishing. Water Moccasins are real problem where I live.
Indeed my Marlin is so damn quiet though. Not a real "scare" factor but at the end of the day the rifle isn't really intended to "scare" anyone.

Indeed. Anyone who is serious about survival, small game, etc., definitely needs a .22 rifle. Plus, the ammo is cheap and they are fun as hell to shoot.

Myself, I have a Remington 550-1 semi-auto rifle. It shoots Shorts, Long, and Long Rifle.
]

Looks very similar to my Marlin. I believe my Marlin is the most produced rifle in history, or right at the top.

 
Top